• About

The Malcolm Auld Blog

~ Marketing Musings and More…

The Malcolm Auld Blog

Monthly Archives: May 2013

“Oops, wrong foot…”

31 Friday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Marketing

≈ 1 Comment

A lifetime ago I was dining at my then girlfriend’s parent’s home. It was Summer and hot. We were all casually dressed without shoes.

My girlfriend’s father was seated at the head of the table. I sat in the first seat to his right. My girlfriend sat in the first seat to his left – opposite me. The rest of the family was spread down the table.

Her father was a butcher, so dinner was no doubt a good meat dish. During said meal, my girlfriend decided to play footsies with me under the table. This was accompanied by a flirt with the eyes, which was damn frustrating as she lived at home with her parents.

As any well mannered Aussie bloke would do, I decided to reciprocate and started playing footsies back. I gave her my best flirt-eye and subtle head nods, but got no response. So I proceeeded a tad more enthusiastically trying to elicite an acknowledgement of delight from her.

After a couple of minutes of under-the-table foot snogging, her father leaned over to me and said “I think you’ve got the wrong foot Malcolm”.

It was all I could do not to spray wine through my nose across the table at my girlfriend. So I feigned a rapid desire to rush to the loo, politely excusing myself for as long as possible.

You've got the wrong foot Malcolm

You’ve got the wrong foot Malcolm

I tell you this story because recently it occured to me that many marketers think they’re playing footsies with their customers, when in fact they are missing their mark completely. I own an email marketing business and have been reviewing replies my clients get to their email campaigns. These are the replies where people ignore all instructions to the contrary and just hit “reply” and start typing in response to a bulk email.

The reply that occurs most is about online payments. Customers are complaining in droves about the fact they are being forced to pay for services online. And for numerous reasons – lots of people don’t have credit cards or they don’t trust the security of the interweb. They even claim vehemently that it’s against the law to restrict payment methods to online. They get very aggressive and threatening in their correspondence. Damn rude in fact.

I suspect like many comments I see on social media, these people are happy to write angrily across cyber space, but they would not have the guts to say the same thing face-to-face to the recipient.

But in case you didn’t know, despite the digital world in which marketers live, many consumers still live very happy analogue lives and don’t want to change – or need to. I even know people who have never used ATMs for fear of being robbed, or concerns over fraud, or possibly losing their card.

I run seminars and even though we offer online bookings, close to half our bookings still come via mail, fax or scanned documents emailed to us. That’s because finance departments still like to see pieces of paper before allowing staff to pay for things. And many staff don’t have company credit cards to use for online payments. BTW – direct mail is still the most powerful media for selling seminars.

So don’t assume that just because you think you’re doing the right thing by forcing customers to online payments, that the customers agree. You might think you’re onto a good thing because it suits you, but you may in fact just be playing with yourself so to speak, rather than with your customers. Ask them what they want. Give them choice. If you don’t, you may really put your foot in it and lose customers instead of improve service.

And in case you’re wondering, ‘no’ her feet weren’t as big as her father’s, but they certainly felt it after dinner. Took a while to live that one down…

you thought my feet were how big?

you thought my feet were how big?

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Those two marketers again…

24 Friday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Marketing

≈ 3 Comments

Dilbert 1

The Optimist says, “The glass is half full.” The Pessimist says, “The glass is half empty.” The Marketing Consultant says, “Your glass needs re-sizing.”

You know you’re a marketer if…you refer to dating as ‘test marketing’.

A retailer was dismayed when a competitor selling the same type of product opened next-door to him, displaying a large sign proclaiming “Best Deals.”

Not long after that, he was horrified to find yet another competitor move in next door, on the other side if his store. Its large sign was even more disturbing “Lowest Prices.”

After his initial panic, and concern that he would be driven out of business, he looked for a way to turn the situation to his advantage. Then he had an idea. Next day, he proudly unveiled a huge sign over his front door. It read:

“Main Entrance”

Pinterest joke

Lost in translation:

In Taiwan, the translation of the Pepsi slogan “Come alive with the Pepsi Generation” came out as “Pepsi will bring your ancestors back from the dead.”

Also in Chinese, the Kentucky Fried Chicken slogan “finger-lickin’ good” came out as “eat your fingers off.”

The American slogan for Salem cigarettes, “Salem – Feeling Free,” got translated in the Japanese market into “When smoking Salem, you feel so refreshed that your mind seems to be free and empty.”

When General Motors introduced the Chevy Nova in South America, it was apparently unaware that “no va” means “it won’t go.” After the company figured out why it wasn’t selling any cars, it renamed the car in its Spanish markets to the Caribe.

Ford had a similar problem in Brazil when the Pinto flopped. The company found out that Pinto was Brazilian slang for “tiny male genitals”. Ford pried all the nameplates off and substituted Corcel, which means horse.

When Parker Pen marketed a ballpoint pen in Mexico, its ads were supposed to say “It won’t leak in your pocket and embarrass you.” However, the company’s mistakenly thought the Spanish word “embarazar” meant embarrass. Instead the ads said that “It won’t leak in your pocket and make you pregnant.”

An American t-shirt maker in Miami printed shirts for the Spanish market which promoted the Pope’s visit. Instead of the desired “I Saw the Pope” in Spanish, the shirts proclaimed “I Saw the Potato.”

Chicken-man Frank Perdue’s slogan, “It takes a tough man to make a tender chicken,” got terribly mangled in another Spanish translation. A photo of Perdue with one of his birds appeared on billboards all over Mexico with a caption that explained “It takes a hard man to make a chicken aroused.”

Hunt-Wesson introduced its Big John products in French Canada as Gros Jos before finding out that the phrase, in slang, means “big breasts.” In this case, however, the name problem did not have a noticeable effect on sales.

Colgate introduced a toothpaste in France called Cue, the name of a notorious porno mag.

In Italy, a campaign for Schweppes Tonic Water translated the name into Schweppes Toilet Water.

Japan’s second-largest tourist agency was mystified when it entered English-speaking markets and began receiving requests for unusual sex tours. Upon finding out why, the owners of Kinki Nippon Tourist Company changed its name.


Three marketers and three accountants were traveling by train to a conference. At the station, the three accountants each bought tickets and watched as the three marketers bought only one ticket.

“How are three people going to travel on only one ticket?” asked an accountant. “Watch and you’ll see”, answered a marketer.

They all boarded the train. The accountants took their respective seats, but the three marketers all crammed into a rest room and closed the door behind them. Shortly after the train departed, the conductor came around collecting tickets. He knocked on the restroom door and said, “Ticket, please”.

The door opened just a crack and a single arm emerged with a ticket in hand.
The conductor took it and moved on.

The accountants saw this and agreed it was a quite clever idea. So, after the conference, the accountants decide to copy the marketers on the return trip and save some money (being clever with money, and all that). When they got to the station, they bought a single ticket for the return trip. To their astonishment, the marketers didn’t buy a ticket at all.

“How are you going to ride without a ticket”? said one perplexed accountant.
“Watch and you’ll see”, answered a marketer.

When they boarded the train, the three accountants crammed into a restroom and the three marketers crammed into another one nearby. The train departed. Shortly afterward, one of the marketers left his restroom and walked over to the restroom where the accountants were hiding. He knocked on the door and said, “Ticket, please.”

avagoodweegend…

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Old tricks, new dogs…

23 Thursday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Branding, Content Marketing, Direct Marketing, Marketing

≈ Leave a comment

A lifetime ago when I was a marketing manager at TNT, our courier service call centre was used for all the DRTV advertisements. Partly because we were the only call centre in town and partly because we did the fulfillment of the sales.

Every time an ad ran on TV, the phones would ring off the hook for about 23 minutes and then the long tail of latecomers would call over the next 24 hours.

How many would you like to order sir?

How many would you like to order sir?

One of the tricks we used was to answer the phone by saying “thanks for calling, all our lines are busy, what’s your name and number and we’ll call you right back“. The punters immediately spilled their details, which were written down on a piece of paper by the telephonist. These notes were then put onto a conveyor and sent to a team of specialist outbound salespeople.

These salespeople then rang the unsuspecting punters. They started the call with an apology; “sorry we couldn’t take your call” followed by an immediate upsell; “the (product name) is very popular, most people are buying them in lots of (insert quantity)“. One poor sod was convinced to buy 16 Asian Woks as Christmas presents for his family in one call.

Years later I was struck with the flu and decided in my weak state to spend a day watching television – particularly the DR ads, just to see what was happening on the box. An ad for a collectors edition box set of Classical Music CDs was offered. Mother’s Day was around the corner, what a great idea for a gift. So I rang the 1800 number and waited with my guard up. After all, I know the tricks.

A lady answered with “all our lines are busy, please give me your name and number and we’ll call you right back“. And without hesitating, I did.

So I sat on my lounge, Vicks Vapour Rub in one hand, phone in the other, preparing myself for the upsell. It didn’t take long for the phone to ring. “Sorry we couldn’t take your call, the CDs are very popular and we have a special offer if you decide to buy the 2-pack. Are you buying for yourself or a gift for someone else?”

So I bought 2 CD sets – one for mum and one for me.

Special price to you for 2 sets...

Special price to you for 2 sets…

Fast forward to last month. An insert fell from the Saturday newspaper. It was an English shirtmaker launching in Australia with a special offer. I put it aside, but my bride thought it was junk mail and threw it in the recycle bin.

A few weeks later the same insert appeared again – a sure sign it worked the first time. So I read it and went to the website to order, given the introductory offer was a quarter the price of the shirt I’d bought the week previously. While ordering I received an upsell. Order a fifth shirt and it will be cheaper. It was – and all five shirts automatically reduced in price on my shopping cart. Very convincing.

I ordered from the UK on Saturday afternoon with the (as advised) expectation of 7 to 10 days delivery. The following Tuesday morning, a courier appeared at my door. You guessed it – my shirts had arrived 3 days after ordering. Under promise and over deliver. There was even a return address label with instructions in case I wanted to return them. Outstanding service.

In a few days the email arrived asking for my opinions on the service. This week I received an email with offers including free delivery and the day following the email, a 68 page colour catalogue appeared in my mail box.

A tactile catalogue with offers

A tactile catalogue with offers

There is nothing unusual about this business. It’s old-fashioned direct marketing using a combination of media channels. Smart marketers like Cellarmasters Wines and Amazon have been using these old tricks for years in the mail, on the phone and on their websites. It’s not a digital skill, it’s a marketing skill.

But in today’s buzzword-driven digital world we don’t want to appear old-fashioned. So should we be calling it ‘engagement marketing’, or ‘integrated marketing’, or ‘multi-channel marketing’ or ‘content marketing’ or that new chestnut “inbound marketing’?

The fact is, it’s really just commonsense – no buzzword needed. It’s old tricks applied with new technology. Good service, that uses simple data to drive the sale.

Have to go now – the free delivery offer closes soon and there’s a great price on the 3-pack polo shirts if I order now…

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

World’s biggest FB meltdown or just digi-wind?

16 Thursday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Branding, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

I wasn’t sure whether to post about this or not today. Mainly because it can just add fuel to the fire.

But it reflects something that many journalists have claimed about the interweb world. The majority of posts to journalists are negative. That is, most people who post ‘feedback’ are those that disagree with the writer. Our nature is not to write ‘well done” or ‘I agree with you’. If we agree or enjoy an article, we do so unconsciously and get on with life.

But if we don’t agree with the article/post, our nature is to go on the attack, often in a vile way. And much of the criticism is directed at the writer, rather than at what was written. And these ‘critics’ hide behind the anonymity of the interweb. My guess is that most people wouldn’t have the guts to say to a person’s face the negative comments they publish in their social posts.

Of course when the story is a feel-good one and the only possible comments of sensible humans can be positive, this doesn’t apply. (that’s my disclaimer).

One of the trending topics in social media today is the story of Amy’s Bakehouse. I’m not familiar with the ‘reality’ TV show mentioned in the article, but it obviously influenced some of the comments.

Amy bakehouse

Check it out on this blog.

If you search “Amy’s Baking Company Bakery Boutique & Bistro” you’ll find lots of articles about it.

A couple of points of interest here:

1. The lifeblood of social media is traditional mass media. It’s the coverage by mass media such as television, radio and press that creates the mass awareness of something that is becoming popular in social media. If the mass media didn’t give the posts publicity, they would die on the vine within their narrow social ecosystem.

2. Just because a few people on a social site start a ruckus, don’t think the whole world is against you. If you have good customer relationships and use all the powerful personal media like face-to-face service, mail, phone, email and sms you can talk directly with your customers and continue to keep doing business with them. Yes, you can address the social chatter, but most social chaff will disappear tomorrow as the next ‘shiny bright digi-object’ appears and attracts the attention of those with not much better to do. I’d guess many of the social comments came from people who are not even customers of Amy’s – they just wanted to be critical.

3. When you ask someone for an opinion, what do you get? An opinion! And if you encourage a bunch of people to join your opinion, the majority that do will be the ones with the same opinion. The contrary rarely air their views, because they just aren’t as interested as those with opposing opinions.

4. Group think and herd mentality are rife online. The author of the post says the episode was embarrassing. And it was, not just the stupidity of Amy’s Bakehouse (at which a friend of mine, coincidentally named Amy, used to work), but also of those who posted comments. In their twilight years I wonder if they’ll be reflecting warmly about those things they used to post online?

5. There is a growing backlash against the trolls and naysayers who constantly attack people and companies via social sites. Apparently Amy’s “Likes” have gone through the roof, which is one way people with contrary opinions can show their support.

6. Every day there is a new “Most Epic” or “Biggest Fail” on the interweb. It’s become a pi**ing competition to see who can make the most outrageous claim to position themselves and their digi-wind in cyber real estate.

I have no idea what the owners of Amy’s Baking Company Bakery Boutique & Bistro are really like. I hope for their sake this is just a speed-hump and they learn from it and continue to trade. We’ll keep an eye on it – that is unless another shiny bright digi-object doesn’t attract our attention.

Oh look, there’s a cat up a tree…

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Don’t get caught short in the city…

15 Wednesday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Marketing

≈ 5 Comments

On Mother’s Day I drove my clan into the city to watch them run the 8km Mother’s Day Classic – which is possibly a tad overstatement as a name, but it was a classic Autumn morning.

40 years of football have taken an unfair toll on my knees, so I no longer run, but chauffeur and cheer enthusiastically from the sidelines.

As they pushed and puffed their way around the course I had a call of nature, so wandered over to Hyde Park to go to the loo. It was then that I realised society has indeed gone completely mad.

You can no longer go to the loo. There’s no men’s or women’s toilet you can stroll (or rush) into at your leisure to complete your ablutions. No folks, instead, you now have unisex street furniture. Gotta luv a marketing buzzword.

Now the only species I know that is interested in peeing on street furniture is our friendly K9s. But some bureaucrat has deemed it is now the preferred option for humans who need to use a public loo.

The street furniture was easy to spot. There was a queue of people hopping from one foot to the other while waiting their turn to use the only street furniture that worked. 50% of the furniture was out of service. There was only one loo as far as the eye could see, to service an entire park full of punters.

I joined the queue and waited. This gave me time to check out the instructions on how to use said street furniture, as obviously we adult humans need training in how to go to the loo.

Here’s some of the instructions, which read more like “orders” – you got the feeling someone was watching you to make sure you obeyed.

something to read while you wait...

something to read while you wait…

It takes longer to clean than to take a leak

It takes longer to clean than to take a leak

Don't hit the wrong button as you squat...

Don’t hit the wrong button as you squat…

If you need 20 minutes you need more than street furniture

If you need 20 minutes you need more than street furniture

so where do you throw the loo paper?

so where do you throw the loo paper?

more than just street furniture

more than just street furniture

The loo paper looked like it was a runner-up in a product test for industrial sandpaper. I’m sure it could have scraped paint from the side of the street furniture.

The cleaning cycle involves some sort of automatic internal washing and spraying that completely wets the floor. Everything was wet – you didn’t know what to touch. If you want to drop your duds and sit, you have to hold them above your ankles so they don’t get soaked on the wet floor – not an easy thing to do, particularly if you are in any way incapacitated, or just like to sit upright as you go about your business.

The company that ‘manages’ the street furniture is the same one that manages the advertising in bus shelters and other ‘street furniture’. It’s no wonder their were so many signs on the thing.

I’m sure the directors of said company don’t have these types of “inconveniences” installed in their offices. I suspect they can come and go to the loo whenever it suits them. No queuing in line while the cleaning cycle does its stuff.

Luckily I was able to understand the orders and survive the street furniture ‘customer experience’. I’m sure that term is in a strategic document for the street furniture proposal.

Mind you it would have been faster and easier to go behind one of those very large trees in the park. But imagine the uproar if I was caught doing what comes natural in a park?

Here’s an idea for the ablutions bureaucrats – install men’s and women’s loos with multiple facilities (even unisex facilities) – and doorways you can enter at your leisure. Don’t restrict the facilities to one unisex unit that takes longer to clean than to use. Remember peak hour in your own family bathroom?

Then install street furniture for the purpose of sitting on, not sh*ting in. You’ll be amazed how many people use it.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Another two marketers walk into a bar…

10 Friday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Marketing

≈ 4 Comments

Happy Friday. I need some light humour to finish the week – hope you get a chuckle too…

social media cartoon

Tile Grout

Some headlines:

1. Auto Repair Service. Free pick-up and delivery. Try us once, you’ll never go anywhere again.
2. Mt. Kilimanjaro, the breathtaking backdrop for the Serena Lodge. Swim in the lovely pool while you drink it all in.
3. The hotel has bowling alleys, tennis courts, comfortable beds, and other athletic facilities.
4. Dinner special – Turkey $2.35; Chicken or Beef $2.25; Children $2.00.
5. For sale: antique desk suitable for lady with thick legs and large drawers.
6. Now is your chance to have your ears pierced and get an extra pair to take home.
7. Tired of cleaning yourself? Let me do it.
8. See ladies blouses. 50% off!

Some lightbulb jokes:

Q: How many sub-editors does it take to screw in a lightbulb? A: We can’t tell whether you mean “insert a new lightbulb” or “have sexual relations inside a lightbulb”. Can we reword it to remove ambiguity?

Q: How many art directors does it take to change a lightbulb? A: Does it have to be a lightbulb?

Q: How many proof readers does it take to change a lightbulb? A: The last time this was asked it involved Art Directors. Is the difference intentional? It seems inconsistent.

Q: How many writers does it take to change a lightbulb? A: Why do we have to change it?

Q: How many editors does it take to change a lightbulb? A: It was supposed to be in place last week!

Q: How many publishers does it take to change a lightbulb? A: Three. One to screw it in and two more to hold down the editor.

Q: How many marketing directors does it take to change a lightbulb? A: It isn’t too late to make it neon, is it?

Q: How many advertising directors does it take to change a lightbulb? A: We’re not sure because the client might change it tomorrow. Cut some editorial anyway.

Q: How many sales directors does it take to change a lightbulb? A: (pause) I get it! It’s one of those lightbulb jokes, right?

If a book about failures doesn’t sell, is it a success?

Smoking is one of the leading causes of statistics. ~Fletcher Knebel~

I have always believed that writing advertisements is the second most profitable form of writing. The first, of course, is ransom notes ~ Philip Dusenberry, quoted in Eric Clark, The Want Makers: Inside the World of Advertising, 1988.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Coke & Unilever – social media doesn’t pay…

09 Thursday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Branding, Marketing, Social Media

≈ 3 Comments

In his continuing expose into social media for BRW magazine, Professor Mark Ritson looks at what the big players are doing.

If you follow the “Top Social Sites” lists and there are dozens of them, you’ll know that the packaged goods manufacturers have sunk mountains of shareholder funds into social media, in the hope of getting a profitable ROI from Fans, Followers and Likes.

To quote from Mark’s article: “Coke and Unilever were both in the vanguard of big social-media spending and both have discovered that once you compare social versus other tools, apples to apples, it often proves disappointing.”

Brands are moving budgets away from social media to traditional channels

Brands are moving budgets away from social media to traditional channels

“Unilever’s return on investment from in-store promotions can be as much as 50% higher than campaigns run across Facebook and Twitter, according to sources close to the company.”

As you’ll see in my last post – the reason people Like or Follow has to do with pre-existing brand loyalty. It’s why people join ‘loyalty’ clubs – even those as simple as the coffee cards we carry in our wallets and purses. It’s rare for people to become a fan of a brand they’ve never used, so obviously the majority of people who Like or Follow you are your existing customers.

These are the customers that smart marketers already have on a mailing list with such contact details as mailing address, email address and phone number. They are also the ones you don’t want to be offering lots of discounts to, unless you want to drastically reduce their lifetime value to you – and reduce your bottom line.

According to Mark’s article, here’s what Coca Cola found when they applied ROI metrics to their social media:

“When Coke put its social buzz data through the same complex analytical tool that it use to measure the ROI of its other marketing activities, the company ‘didn’t see any statistically significant relationship between our buzz and our short-term sales”

Social media is not helping sales

Social media is not helping sales

It seems the humble sales promotion gets better results than the same promotion conducted in social channels. Certainly those promotions that force customers to enter via Facebook lose enormous numbers of entrants because of the resistance by people to do so. 101 Marketing says make it as easy as possible to enter a competition. If you create additional barriers to entry you reduce the number of possible participants.

Proctor & Gamble’s campaign for Old Spice has won numerous awards in social media circles. However sales of Old Spice shower stuff decreased. And apparently the sales that did occur were at the expense of other shower wash stuff in the P&G stable.

This often happens with sales promotions – they create a short-term, boost in sales and pack-storing in the pantry. This is followed by a short-term decline in sales of the promoted brand or of others in the stable of brands owned by the promoter.

The Old Spice campaign was just a new twist on an (excuse the pun) old sales promotion technique. The only difference was the media channel. I still don’t know what red-blooded Old Spice male would use shower wash instead of soap, but that’s another discussion.

Interestingly I was looking at a social media slide presentation from AdSchool in Oz. Now I didn’t have the privilege of the associated commentary. But in 100 slides there was one slide that said ‘CPA industry average is $1.70’ – I’m not sure what was being acquired. The only other slide that had anything to do with metrics said “Ask the client what metrics are important to them. Build reports around them.” There’s some insight for you – ask the client.

Otherwise in 100 slides there is nothing about ROI – apart from some sentiment analysis. Maybe it’s in another slide show, the commentary that accompanied the presentation, or I missed it? Though given the 100 slides there isn’t much else you could teach about social media. It is an enthusiastic presentation though.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Look at me, look at me…

08 Wednesday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Branding, Sales Promotion, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

Ever wondered why people become fans or followers of brands on Facebook or Twitter?

Boston market research group CMB asked the question. They publish regular reports about various aspects of marketing you can download.

Think about the context as well. They asked people who had clicked they were a fan or follower ‘why’?

This slide demonstrates that more people who are already customers say they are more likely to buy after becoming a fan or follower. What else would they say given they had clicked the fan/follower link?

Fans or more likely to buy - duh!

Fans or more likely to buy – duh!

This slide reveals the majority of people who do follow or become a fan only have time to follow less than 5 brands. This is not surprising – we all have real lives that don’t revolve around building click-relations with brands.

75% of females follow less than 5 brands

75% of females follow less than 5 brands

The majority of those who become fans (or should that be Fans with a capital “F”?) do so because they are already customers – which was probably predictable anyway.

It's about me the customer

It’s about me the customer

Interestingly the primary reason people become FB fans is “to receive discounts”. So we’re encouraging the people who are already customers to register to receive discounts on stuff they are already buying? Is that smart marketing?

Existing customers who want discounts

Existing customers who want discounts

The main reasons people Follow tweets is because they are a customer, followed closely by “to receive discounts”. Do you see a pattern here?

I'm a customer, give me discounts...

I’m a customer, give me discounts…

But the Primary reason for becoming a Follower on Twitter is “to receive discounts and promotions”.

Give me discounts, I want discounts...

Give me discounts, I want discounts…

What is all this data revealing about brand Fans and Followers?

Well for one thing it’s not about the brands.

It’s all about the customers – look at me, look at me. Look what I’m clicking on. How can I get deals and discounts by doing so?

Running perpetual sales promotions and discounting your products and services to your most valuable customers are guaranteed ways to go broke. And they’re certainly not a smart way to invest your marketing budget.

But hey, I’m confident your shareholders would rather you have lots of fans and followers than lots of profit.

I’m planning a home renovation – better go follow some roofers and tile grouters and builders to see what discounts I can get.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Social media eye-camera studies reveal…

07 Tuesday May 2013

Posted by Malcolm Auld in Branding, Social Media

≈ 3 Comments

My blog has been in recess over the last couple of weeks – 2 deaths in the family within 2 days, sort of puts blogging about social media in context.

Am back on the horse now, here’s something I’d started a couple of weeks ago:

Thank you for all the positive feedback on the recent social media blogs. Over the next couple posts I’ll share some of the research I have discovered while rewriting my marketing text, which should hopefully be complete in a couple months.

One thing I do for a living is train marketers and business owners. In the last couple of years, the delegate’s reactions to my social media presentation have been quite interesting. Because there is so much BS and confusion about social media, there is enormous anxiety among business owners about whether or not to ‘invest’ in social media.

Interestingly I’ve never had so many delegates thank me so enthusiastically following a presentation. Most are just relieved to learn their business won’t collapse because they don’t tweet every day or don’t have a FB page. From around 2,000 delegates in the last 2 years, less than 5 have been able to make social media pay for itself. That’s not to say you can’t get a positive ROI on social media – but there’s a reason it’s not called “Business Media“.

If all social media disappeared tomorrow, nothing would change in business. The world would carry on and goods and services would continue to be traded.

The main impact would be the inability for companies to react to complaints as rapidly as they now can when tracking social posts. Curiously if companies had provided decent call centres that were staffed by locals, they could have developed a customer service culture where complaints were handled simply over the phone – the customers wouldn’t need to use social media.

Instead, companies pay people to track complaints via social sites, follow-up these complainers via social channels and try to get them on the phone to solve the problem – as most cannot be resolved via a tweet. Go figure.

When you look at the regular published lists of “Top Social Media sites” the best are inevitably major global brands like Coca Cola or Starbucks – brands that can afford to spend a fortune in such a channel without measurable results, like they do in brand advertising. And rarely do the Top sites reveal costs associated with being a top site – which is usually massive.

Search engines like Google now include social media presence as one of the factors when assessing a site’s value for search results. They do this because they have a vested interest. Google owns YouTube and Google+ so businesses are being forced to use social media even if they don’t want to. This becomes a major problem for businesses without strong brands, in categories where the customers search the product category rather than the brand name.

The stronger your brand name as a key word, the less you need to rely on SEO and PPC. But that’s another blog.

Sir Martin Sorrell - social media has not always failed but often failed...

Sir Martin Sorrell – social media has not always failed but often failed…

Sir Martin Sorrell’s WPP Group manages more social media campaigns than any other agency group on the planet. Here’s what had to say when interviewed about social media:

“…it’s not a medium that really lends itself to commercial exploitation. And when you look at the times that people have tried to commercially exploit it, it’s not always failed but often failed.”

“These are extremely powerful channels and new media. The more you try and invade it with commercial messages, the more at risk you are. Everyone is keen … They get the hits and get the traffic but it’s very difficult to monetize. It may be intrinsically due to their personal nature; they are not media that lend themselves easily to what we’re talking about.”

I found some interesting eye camera studies on social sites from a couple of years ago. The sites have changed their layouts since, but you’d find similar results today. The YouTube study was done in the week following Michael Jackson’s death. Under the hottest part of the map is a MJ video, but there’s also another MJ video lower on the page that doesn’t rate an eyeball.

Facebook heatmap

Facebook heatmap

Facebook - we only view the latest posts

Facebook – we only view the latest posts

Twitter heatmap

Twitter heatmap

Twitter - we only view the latest posts

Twitter – we only view the latest posts

YouTube heatmap

YouTube heatmap

YouTube - we only view the latest posts

YouTube – we only view the latest posts

It confirms what most of us know – people only focus on the latest posts that are on their screen at the time they are on the site. They rarely scroll below the fold. It’s why I created the acronym – ASS Time – to describe the “Connection Paradox” – the more people you are connected to, the less chance you have of seeing or reading their posts.

There’s an article in the Fairfax press about why small businesses have to be social to survive. You can assess the value of the content, but interestingly I searched the content and the word ‘costs’ or ‘return on investment’ are never mentioned.

Once again people making money by telling other people how to make money – even though they don’t make their living practicing what they preach. This is typical of so much publicity around social media. Business owners and marketers want information about the cost and ROI of social media, but promoters of the channel are loathe to supply it.

Smells a lot like 1999, just before the dot.con crash.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Recent Posts

  • WOW a 5-hour marketing seminar on a subject that doesn’t exist…
  • Good grief, now LinkedIn staff are sending unsolicited social selling spam…
  • Another example of social selling failure with marketing automation on LinkedIn…
  • Has COVID killed the culture cult…
  • Social selling has become the new spam…

Archives

  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • December 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012

Categories

  • Advertising
  • B2B Marketing
  • BIG DATA
  • Branding
  • Content Marketing
  • Copywriting
  • Culture
  • Customer Service
  • Digital
  • Digital marketing
  • Direct Marketing
  • Email marketing
  • Group Buying
  • Marketing
  • Marketing Automation
  • Media
  • Meetings
  • Mobile marketing
  • PPC
  • QR Codes
  • Remarketing
  • retail
  • Sales
  • Sales Promotion
  • SEM & SEO
  • small data
  • Social Media
  • social selling
  • Telemarketing
  • Thought Leadership
  • Uncategorized
  • Viral marketing

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • The Malcolm Auld Blog
    • Join 543 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Malcolm Auld Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: